
I was wonderfully surprised when I came upon Orwell’s review of Hitler’s book. You know he would have something sharp and provocative to say. The book review was published in March of 1940.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
How was it that he was able to put his monstrous vision across. It is easy to say that at one stage of his career he was financed by the heavy industrialists, who saw in him the man who would smash the socialists and communists. They would not have backed him, however, if he had not talked a great movement into existence already. Again, the situation in Germany, with its seven million unemployed, was obviously favorable for demagogues. But Hitler could not have succeeded against his many rivals if it had not been for the attraction of his own personality, which one can feel in the clumsy writing of “Mein Kampf,” and which is no doubt overwhelming when one hears his speeches. I should like to put it on record that I have never been able to dislike Hitler. Ever since he came to power - till then, like nearly everyone, I had been deceived into thinking that he did not matter - I have reflected that I would certainly kill him if I could get within reach of him, but that I could feel no personal animosity. The fact is that there is something deeply appealing about him. One feels it again when one sees his photographs - and I recommend especially the photograph at the beginning of Hurst and Blackett’s edition, which shows Hitler in his early Brownshirt days. It is a pathetic, doglike face, the face of a man suffering under intolerable wrongs. In a rather more manly way it reproduces the expression of innumerable pictures of Christ crucified, and there is little doubt that that is how Hitler sees himself.
-- George Orwell, “Review of Mein Kampf” in Essays (Everyman’s Library edition, p. 250)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>