1940s Communists and the Soviet Union
Dec. 24th, 2014 07:44 amWhen news of the Soviet Union’s forced-labor camps broke out to the larger world, communists and Soviet sympathizers needed to work out their cognitive dissonance. This excerpt is about an article by Merleau-Ponty, signed by Sartre, that attempted to do that.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
The “decadence of Russian communism does not make the class struggle a myth, ‘free enterprise’ possible or desirable, or the Marxist criticism in general null and void.” What was most important for Sartre was his support of two popular claims. First, the article reasserted Marxism’s “humane inspiration,” meaning that he and Merleau-Ponty had “the same values as a Communist.” Second, “whatever the nature of the present Soviet society may be, the USSR is on the whole situation, in the balance of powers, on the side of those who are struggling against the forms of exploitation known to us.” The labor camps marred, but did not cancel, the Soviet Union’s progressive place in the world.
-- Ronald Aronson, “Camus and Sartre”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
The “decadence of Russian communism does not make the class struggle a myth, ‘free enterprise’ possible or desirable, or the Marxist criticism in general null and void.” What was most important for Sartre was his support of two popular claims. First, the article reasserted Marxism’s “humane inspiration,” meaning that he and Merleau-Ponty had “the same values as a Communist.” Second, “whatever the nature of the present Soviet society may be, the USSR is on the whole situation, in the balance of powers, on the side of those who are struggling against the forms of exploitation known to us.” The labor camps marred, but did not cancel, the Soviet Union’s progressive place in the world.
-- Ronald Aronson, “Camus and Sartre”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>