Jan. 25th, 2015

monk111: (Orwell)
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Poetry was not Larkin’s ambition. He wanted to be a novelist. “Novels seem to me richer, broader, deeper, more enjoyable than poems,” he remarked in an interview. At first, it seemed he would prosper in fiction. By 24, he had published two fine novels, Jill (1946) and A Girl in Winter (1947), both finished while singlehandedly running a small-town library. As critic Cyril Connolly once observed, however, “whom the gods wish to destroy, they first call promising.” Larkin spent the next five years agonizing over an abortive third novel. In the meantime he helped Amis revise his debut novel, Lucky Jim. When Amis’s book appeared in 1954 to immense critical and commercial success, Larkin gave up fiction. “It was,” he confessed, “a great grief to me.”

Failure and regret, however, were mother’s milk to the young librarian. As his dreams of being a great novelist expired, Larkin poured his full talent into poetry. He discarded his lofty, early models, Yeats and Auden, and studied instead the homely genius of Thomas Hardy (another novelist-turned-poet). Larkin then brought a novelistic sensibility into his verse. Emphasizing the prosaic virtues of plot, setting, character, and narrative voice—the building blocks of fiction—he crafted a new sort of lyric poem, one firmly placed in the everyday world and yet charged with evocative power. His new poems also had personality; they were simultaneously savage and yet compassionate, very depressing and very funny. His language grew commonplace without losing its musicality, and he displayed a gift for using complicated verse forms in ways that sounded utterly conversational, as in the opening lines of “Annus Mirabilis”:

Sexual intercourse began

In nineteen sixty-three

(Which was rather late for me)—

Between the end of the Chatterly ban

And the Beatles’ first LP.


-- Dana Gioia, "The Greatness of Philip Larkin" in Commentary Magazine

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
monk111: (Effulgent Days)
A beautiful morning. The bright sunshine is a little hard on my wonky eyes, but beautiful. A little cool, just a touch of nippiness in the clear, crisp air. A perfect morning for Bo to take care of his doggy business, as we would just walk around the yard together for a good fifteen minutes or so, sharing a few hugs along the way, when he was alive, ten years ago. As for the cats, they can now go outside and beat up some trees instead of our furniture. ... I really hate losing my forties. I feel so done. And I never got to do anything. I guess my life really was just one long rainy weekend. That's not terrible: to enjoy some good books, free of brute labor, to just think about life. It's just that a little sex would have been nice.
monk111: (Noir Detective)
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

INTERVIEWER

Does the reaction to your work often surprise you?

HELLER

Constantly. And I rely on it. I really don’t know what I’m doing until people read what I’ve written and give me their reactions. I didn’t know what Catch-22 was all about until three months after it came out, when people, often total strangers who had no interest in saying the right (or wrong) things to me, began coming up and talking about the book. It meant different things to them. I thought the chaplain was the second most impressive character in the book (after Yossarian). But it turned out to be Milo. Then, it surprised me that things in Catch-22 turned out to be very funny. I thought I was being humorous, but I didn’t know I would make people laugh. In my apartment one day I heard this friend of mine in another room laughing out loud, and that was when I realized I could be comic. I began using that ability consciously—not to turn Catch-22 into a comic work, but for contrast, for ironic effect. I really don’t think authors know too much about the effect of what they’re doing.

-- Joseph Heller at The Paris Review

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
monk111: (Effulgent Days)
A scene has been contrived for me by my supposed overseers and observers. I am with an attractive young woman. I am even driving. She succeeds in opening me up. I try to explain to her that I feel so alien to the world that not only do I feel as though I am living in a dream, but it even feels like it is somebody else's dream.
monk111: (Orwell)
This excerpt illustrates how much Lincoln had to struggle against in his boyhood to realize his potential. His father, Thomas, was very anti-education.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Lincoln’s father regarded physical strength as sufficient to make a manly man and thought time spent on schooling was wasted. He would “slash” Abe “for neglecting his work by reading.” Sometimes he even threw out the boy’s books. Five years after Lincoln, at the age of 22, left his father’s home, Thomas Lincoln scoffed: “I suppose Abe is still fooling hisself with eddication. I tried to stop it, but he had got that fool idea in his head, and it can’t be got out. Now I hain’t got no eddication, but I get along far better than ef I had.” Thomas then showed how he kept his accounts by marking a rafter with a piece of coal and proudly declared: “that thar’s a heap better’n yer eddication.” He added that “if Abe don’t fool away all his time on his books, he may make something yet.”

-- Michael Burlingame, “Abraham Lincoln: A Life”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Page generated Sep. 29th, 2025 07:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios