Keats, Shakespeare, and the Bible
Mar. 1st, 2015 08:09 amWe have an interesting argument that Keats's "Ode to a Nightingale" and "Ode on a Grecian Urn" owe a good deal to Shakespeare's "King Lear" that in turn is indebted to the Bible's "Book of Job". I cannot say that I am convinced by the supposed connections between Keats's poems and "Lear", but I like the suggested relationship among these works. For one, although it now seems obvious, I never thought about the similarity between "Lear" and "Job". I am not sure that Shakespeare had "Job" consciously in mind, but it is nonetheless a fascinating proposition.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
[Keats] didn’t study Shakespeare: he lived it. Shakespeare was scripture for him, and the scriptures were not; Keats knew them but didn’t revere them. He cited Shakespeare as his highest authority all the time, with the remarkable depth and flagrant inaccuracy of associative and not literal memory. He recalled lines not by and for themselves but as they embodied perspectives, scenes, and whole plots, and recalled all of that as something like revealed truth as spoken by Shakespeare the “Presider,” whom he imagined hovering over him, as he wrote in his letters.
-- Adam Plunkett, "Keats and King Lear"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
[Keats] didn’t study Shakespeare: he lived it. Shakespeare was scripture for him, and the scriptures were not; Keats knew them but didn’t revere them. He cited Shakespeare as his highest authority all the time, with the remarkable depth and flagrant inaccuracy of associative and not literal memory. He recalled lines not by and for themselves but as they embodied perspectives, scenes, and whole plots, and recalled all of that as something like revealed truth as spoken by Shakespeare the “Presider,” whom he imagined hovering over him, as he wrote in his letters.
-- Adam Plunkett, "Keats and King Lear"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>