![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Easter again. Christianity is now only a passing interest for me, but we have an article that captures well what the religion meant to me when I was getting a little serious about it during my midlife crisis.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
When he was nothing but a suspended carcass, dripping with his own blood and other people’s spit, there were no worshippers around clapping their hands and singing their hymns. They were long gone. At the very end, ironically at the moment of greatest triumph, he had no followers left. That says something profoundly counterintuitive about what a successful church looks like. For if the core of the Christian message – death first, then resurrection – is so existentially full-on that nobody can possibly endure it, then a church that successfully proclaims that message is likely to be empty and not full. Which is also why, quite possibly, a successful priest ought to be hated rather than feted. For here, as elsewhere in the Christian story, success and failure are inverted. The first will be last and the last first. The rich are cast down and the poor are exulted. The true king is crowned with mockery and thorns not with gold and ermine.
Christianity, properly understood, is a religion of losers.
-- Giles Fraser at The Guardian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Such a pretty illusion. Of course, in real life, losing is just losing, and nothing will ever make that better.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
When he was nothing but a suspended carcass, dripping with his own blood and other people’s spit, there were no worshippers around clapping their hands and singing their hymns. They were long gone. At the very end, ironically at the moment of greatest triumph, he had no followers left. That says something profoundly counterintuitive about what a successful church looks like. For if the core of the Christian message – death first, then resurrection – is so existentially full-on that nobody can possibly endure it, then a church that successfully proclaims that message is likely to be empty and not full. Which is also why, quite possibly, a successful priest ought to be hated rather than feted. For here, as elsewhere in the Christian story, success and failure are inverted. The first will be last and the last first. The rich are cast down and the poor are exulted. The true king is crowned with mockery and thorns not with gold and ermine.
Christianity, properly understood, is a religion of losers.
-- Giles Fraser at The Guardian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Such a pretty illusion. Of course, in real life, losing is just losing, and nothing will ever make that better.
